Compare

The open-source, self-hosted Obsidian alternative built for teams

Last updated September 9, 2026

Obsidian is a beloved local-first markdown app — your notes are plain files you own, with an unrivaled plugin ecosystem and graph view. But it is built for one person: closed-source, no real-time multiplayer, no built-in AI or MCP, and Obsidian Publish is a hosted service you cannot self-host. tela does not ask you to give up the folder. It exposes every space as a WebDAV tree, so you can mount it — or bisync it with rclone — and keep working in Obsidian against the very same .md files your team edits in the browser.

tela vs Obsidian, at a glance

A feature comparison of tela and Obsidian.
Feature tela Obsidian
Your files stay yours Two-way — mount /dav/ as a folder of .md files with any WebDAV client, or bisync it with rclone Plain .md files in a folder on your disk — the original of this idea
License Open source (AGPL-3.0) Proprietary / closed-source
Self-hostable Yes — self-host free, plus a free cloud tier Local app; Publish is hosted, not self-hostable
Real-time collaboration Yes — real-time multiplayer on documents and spreadsheets No — single-user; async vault sync
Team controls Organizations, groups, per-space roles, invite by email, Google/Microsoft/GitHub sign-in; per-org SSO on Enterprise No — single-user product
Ask your docs (AI) & MCP Built in — ranked full-text always, plus semantic Ask that cites its sources (self-host brings its own model) None official (community plugins)
Publishing to the web Publish a whole space to the open web — no-login reader, clean /handle/space URLs, RSS and a sitemap Obsidian Publish — a paid hosted service
Generate docs from your code Yes — Atlas builds a cited, coverage-checked wiki from git repos and Jira No

Why teams switch to tela

When Obsidian is the better choice

For a single user's personal knowledge base, Obsidian is hard to beat: local-first and offline by default, an enormous plugin library, the graph view, canvas, and total control over a folder of files on your disk with no server in the loop at all. tela's sync is a network mount, not an offline-first local app — lose the connection and you are working on a cache. For solo PKM or a personal digital garden, stay with Obsidian.

Frequently asked questions

Is tela a good Obsidian alternative?

Yes. You do not have to leave the folder behind. Mount your tela spaces as a vault of .md files — any WebDAV client will do, and rclone bisync merges both directions server-side — so your local editor and your team's browser are working on the same files, not on a copy. tela is open-source (AGPL-3.0), self-hostable, and markdown-native, with a built-in MCP server so AI agents read and write your docs.

Can I self-host tela and connect AI agents to it?

Yes. Self-host tela for free (AGPL-3.0) or start on the free cloud tier. Its built-in MCP server lets agents like Claude search, read and write your wiki directly, on tools scoped by the token you give them.

When is Obsidian the better choice?

For a single user's personal knowledge base, Obsidian is hard to beat: local-first and offline by default, an enormous plugin library, the graph view, canvas, and total control over a folder of files on your disk with no server in the loop at all. tela's sync is a network mount, not an offline-first local app — lose the connection and you are working on a cache. For solo PKM or a personal digital garden, stay with Obsidian.

Try tela

tela is an open-source (AGPL), self-hostable team wiki. Self-host it, or start on the free cloud tier at telawiki.com. See the MCP server docs for connecting your agents, or compare tela with other tools.

obsidian.md — pricing + license (verified 2026). tela facts current as of September 9, 2026.